Find a Lawyer

NABCCLA PARVEEN versus ROSHAN DIN

VIII, R, prov 10, Writing Statement, Limitation to Filing Written Statements The court was obliged to allow the entire period of ninety days, even though the time limit was shortest but meanwhile the defendant filed a written statement. Could be asked to do. Where the court found that the defendant was compromising not to execute the written statements despite several delays, there was no need to wait for the ninth day to expire before any district court proceedings. Will terminate their defense by deciding the defendant's appeal against the trial. Changing the fact that the defendant was allowed five motions / opportunities to enter a written statement, he limited himself to the interpretation of the provisions of O. VIII, R 10, the circumstances of the CPC order. I was approved by the District Judge, was not a sustainable plaintiff, however, the permission to enter a written statement on the payment of the cost online advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer