Find a Lawyer

SAIFULLAH KHAMISANI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY

Sections 2A and 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Arts 199 and 212 (3) constitutional application to terminate the employment of a large number of employees in the Pakistan State Oil Company Employee Year, 1997, to all appeals of such employees, including the applicant in the service tribunal. Deleting. Not wanting to file a further appeal before the Supreme Court by the applicant, year 2000, for want of jurisdiction, in the appeals filed by other employees against the service tribunal decision in 2004, by the service tribunal petitioner for other employees. Demand for separation order dismissed. It is permissible to take advantage of the Supreme Court's decision by filing a constitutional petition in 2006, whether the dismissal of the applicant's job was legal or illegal by a competent forum designated by such a mixed forum service tribunal. The question was determined. The decision, which was finalized by not challenging the Supreme Court or the High Court, could not have been effective with the Supreme Court's decision to automatically dismiss both applicant's orders from the service. What will happen to set aside the service tribunal's decision, without challenging them by petition on behalf of the Constitution. Cannot indirectly constitute a constitutional application against a service tribunal decision indirectly presented under the Constitution, even if filing for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution. The ban has been temporarily received. The High Court did not specify the errors on its own. The High Court dismissed the constitutional petition within the limits. \ R \ n \ r \ n law firms from Daud Khel lawyer