MUBARAK ALI RAJPUT versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI
Section 3 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 2A & 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application punishable by three year increment after fine preventing three year increments on applicants Giving a charge sheet alleging corruption from, he filed an appeal against such order, while some similar petitions were heard by the Supreme Court in the case reported in PLD 2006 SC 602. Appealing to section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, its appeal was directed. So the matter was pending before the service tribunal. Later, the Supreme Court passed an order in some other connected case. In this direction, the Tribunal should hear and decide whether the question is pending before the Service Tribunal, whether there is a service appeal, a hearing or not. And that the Registrar or any other officer stated that the Tribunal could not direct such reduction request and that the order was allowed that the letter issued by the Assistant Registrar of the Service Tribunal was set aside and the appeal itself. The same service was sent to the tribunal. Listen to the parties and then on the judicial side to decide whether the appeal is pending before it is adjourned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
