OMER ALI KHAN versus FEDERATION THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PRODUCTION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Section 9 Pakistan Steel Officers Service Rules and Regulations, Para 2 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Promotion Petitioner, who was a regular employee of Pakistan Steel Mills and working as a Manager, was promoted to the rank of Executive Engineer. Granted, there were some side effects. In his ACR, the applicant of the year 2003 alleged that his remarks were made to curb his future prospects of development so that the applicant claimed that he was a competent and experienced person. The Deputy General Manager is entitled to be promoted. His junior was promoted and the applicant was discriminated against for allegedly negative comments; denying the applicant development in his ACR for 2003 based solely on negative comments in his ACR. was not. The decision about the development was largely categorized by the ACR of the employees over a period of five years and was not only made negative comments, paragraph 2 34 of the Pakistan Steel Officers Service Rules and Regulations, from the manager. The deputy general manager had provided the staff development process. A selection post whereby the selection of employees was to be based on an optimal formula and not on the basis of the seniority-less fitness-based selection board data that the respondents' ACR reports indicated. Applicants were promoted before, in the five years their ACRs were better rated by applicants' publicity standards, which was not based on mere and only negative comments in the circumstances, but largely on merits. Was based on the average of each petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer