Find a Lawyer

DR. ITEFAQUE HUSSAIN versus DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, HYDERABAD

R14 (A) (2) Government of Sindh, Treasury Department Notification FD / BB & E / 2 (18) / 75 94 (PVII), Dated 15 10 2002 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Applicant General Provident (GP) Fund Advance Payment Advantage The applicant's ability was that the government approved 40 refundable GP funds in their favor, but the authorities refused to pay them the same amount. Already, 40 percent of its non-refundable GP fund advancement was avail- able. , In accordance with the standards provided under R14 (a) (2) of the General Provident Fund Rules, 1938, and no arrangements were made for it, allowing the applicant to allow such facility a second time. The government had hidden the facts and got an order in their favor. Earlier, the GP Fund Advance was taken by him and did not disclose the entire facts. The order passed by the provincial government in favor of the applicant was misunderstood, which is not based on any principle or policy. And because of this he could be rejected to reject the decision. But the authorities were not obliged to pay it because it was an illegal decision approved by the provincial government and was unable to identify the applicant for any provision under which he was non-refundable at his present age. Can claim another payment from GP Fund. us immigration advocates from Digri lawyer