Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI RAJPUR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ISLAMABAD

Article 199 Constitutional Application Service Termination Application: The applicants / employees did not intentionally file a termination order to mislead the court on the defects of the letters nor was the first in the constitutional application No expiry date was mentioned, nor was the second expiry date mentioned, nor were the orders mentioned with the application memo filed at the end of the 90's 90. While the appointment and termination took place Petition for acquittal from 2 was filed on serious 10 2007 in which no such lot was specified. Ever challenged the termination of his service in any competent court law, including the Labor Court or Service Tribunal, which meant that he was terminated from his employment and that he was terminated due to such pleasures. Were at this stage refusing to challenge the termination of his service. The service of the applicants has come to an end long before it became a past and closed transaction is not hindered by any equivalent principle of law; the matter can be reopened at a desolate stage; Encountered and their relationship was not maintained \ r \ n online advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer