Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHETANI

The plaintiff failed to record any material for the specific performance of the Section 12 sale agreement to show that the agreed amount in the sale agreement between the parties was in the suit for the specific performance. Regarding a contract that was offered, the party had to consult the court that it was ready and willing to perform its part of the agreement, and that the other party was refusing to perform its part of the agreement. Had refused or refused to do so in the event that he was ready to pay his share of the contract. And it is agreed that the defendant in the court had stated that he did not have the money to pay the balance sale. The defendant was allowed to seize the money received from the plaintiff on cancellation of the contract of sale in terms of the contract. The plaintiff lost its right to seek specific performance because it had also failed itself to fix the part of its contract under a specific contract by not paying the stipulated period was an arbitrary relief and the claimant had to decide. He was ready and willing to pay his share of the contract and had taken positive steps to fulfill it. The same thing, which was either not presented in the facts or in the documents attached to the plaintiff, along with the plaintiff's statement in court equity, demanded that the continuation of the proceedings, which was arbitrary in nature, be repeated to the defendant. It is necessary to expose the losses. The suit was dismissed when the circumstances ended female advocates from Besham lawyer