Find a Lawyer

AZIZ BEGUM versus CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY

The Allotment of Allotments in relation to the section of their occupation was predetermined by the Settlement Authority in respect of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 Enemy Property (Custody and Registration) Order, 1965, paragraph 4 (iv). The affidavit of the High Court and the Supreme Court confirming further the right and right of obtaining title documents in connection with the issuance of the PTO, which the enemy favors for the property, however, has a separate part in the possession of the Altas and The Troude is separated as a separate component and is allocated separately to deal with the Enemy Property, which occupies Has been dissolved, cannot deny the transfer of the part of the occupation of the Allies, for which the PTO had already been issued on the assumption that it could be separated and that its separate division should be made independent of Custodian. ponio ACt1o1A can be considered as a separate component. Contrary to observations such as the independent section and the disposable, the intent and intention of the Supreme Court judgment were declared invalid and unlawful lawer from fb area from Nilore lawyer