West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (3) (a) (U) and 15 Individual Requirement Proof The landlord clearly stated in his dismissal application, seeking to evict the tenant from the shop. That it needs a shop for business purposes Appellate Authority dismissed the eviction request, stating that the landlord misrepresented the appellate authority through a witness to the tenant in front of the tenant controller in the eviction request The wrong requirement was not disclosed and the order given by the High Court of the High Courts was not considered. After the appellate authority is unlawful and provides the parties with a hearing opportunity, it will seek remand for fresh judgment in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
