MST. BIBI AND ANOTHER versus MST. HASHIM BIBI AND OTHERS

Review of Punjab Land Revenue Act 1887 Section 16 Revision Practice was not filed within 90 days from the date of order. Special reasons did not show that the request should not be entertained.

P L D 1961 W. P. (Rev.) 103

Before Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue,

West Pakistan

Mst. BIBI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

Mst. HASHIM BIBI AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Revision Side No. 164 of 1960‑61, decided on 25th February 1961, District Lyallpur.

Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887), S. 16‑Revision Practice‑Revision not filed within 90 days from date of order Special reasons not shown‑Petition not to be entertained.

Mr. Lodhi for Petitioners.

ORDER

This application for revision has been made after a lapse of 90 days. The normal practice of the Financial Commissioners followed by the Board of Revenue has been not to entertain applications after a period of 90 days in spite of the fact that the powers of the Board of Revenue to interfere in revision under section 16 have no such limitation. No special remoteness have been adduced for making an exception. The application is accordingly dismissed.

K.M. A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gari Habibullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team