Find a Lawyer

MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER ADMINISTRATION versus IKRAMUDDIN

Sections 46 and 48 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), serving the notice of termination and conducting a prior investigation against the application for termination of service on the charge of section 15 employment fraud. After doing so, the employee appeal services were terminated. It is alleged that he had misbehaved with the shift engineer and was also brutally beaten. The Inquiry Officer presented a notice to his employee in front of the employee, according to which the employees appeared before the inquiry officer and Requested to be adjourned for two days on this basis. His co-worker was not present and, in his absence, he could not attend the inquiry officer to the inquiry officer, instead of giving the employee two days to pray, only two hours were given. And said that the employee did not agree that the job was finished for two hours, and after recording the statements of the witnesses, submit their report to the employer, which, based on the Inquiry Officer's report, Terminate the reasonable service of the employee by the Inquiry Officer for only two hours, in no way justified. Was done and was not enough for the illegal worker to present his defense to the inquiry officer, unless otherwise provided under the Inquiry Officer's Act a two-hour grant was provided with a provision of law because the legal inquiry The officer proceeded to inquire into the employee's absence and record statements of witnesses. And said that the inquiry officer's conduct violated the Labor Court's principles of natural justice property advocates from Chakwal lawyer