Find a Lawyer

STATE versus SHAUKAT ALI

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/396 Special Courts for Speedy Trials Act (XV of 1987), Section 12 (2) The name of the accused was not listed in the FIR The accused was arrested seven days after the incident and one week He was later put on an identity parade followed by a case-by-case trial. Evidence of the identity parade was denied by trial on the basis of templates taken from the suspect's identification parade and track identification parade, the retrieval of a detention watch from an accused and the receipt of money from each accused. That the FIR was not sufficient to attach any of the persons in the identification marks, and that the identification parade was held seven days after the arrest of the accused and that they also jointly tracked the molds with the track identification parade. Time was not used to compare the track numbers of the accused. The tracker was placed solely on the basis of his memory, even though the tracker was a man of extraordinary intelligence, yet the identity of the track would be unbelievable because the first-hand evidence of the tracks of the criminals in the form of templates was with the Investigation Officer, The evidence of the tracker was to be used, thus it was rightly denied by the trial court that the evidence for the recovery of the victim's wristwatch was also accurate. The receipt for the sale of this watch was denied, saying that the watch was sold by the seller who had the receipt to the person who made the same purchase and not the seller. Accordingly, the evidence of the recovery was rightly denied by the trial court, no interference with the decision was sought. give bail online advocate from Jaja Abasian lawyer