Find a Lawyer

ZONAL LABOUR UNION LAKHRA THROUGH ZONAL CHAIRMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF WATER AND POWER

Sections 2 (i), 5, 22 to 26 and 42 of the Constitution Request Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 9, 18, 153 and 154 Constitutional application Privatization or lease of the employer company The main issue of privatization or non-privatization constitutional application Was. The applicant / trade union had requested that the company be privatized against the provisions of the Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000, and that the privatization program was in violation of the provisions of Articles 9, 18 and 154 of the Constitution and that the employer was not a company. Has a transparent plate. However, the company was not privatized, but the terms and conditions mentioned in the lease document were leased for a specific period. The letters and documents produced on the record show that the company was leased for a specified period of 20 years. The year and the lease deadline shows that employees were guaranteed a lease term through salaries, wages, social and retirement benefits and benefits leasing in relation to employees' practical responsibilities, Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 There was no privatization, but the terms of the lease on a specific period of lease, on specific terms and conditions, could give an independent impression that it was not only in the interest of the company, but also the employees, the public as well as the country. Employees were not given the right to terminate their jobs when it was established that the company was not privatized, no observations on it. Yes it was done The validity of the provisions of the Privatization Act along with the relevant Articles of the Constitution was not confirmed. divorce advocates from Rahimyar Khan lawyer