Find a Lawyer

CHUTTAL KHAN CHACHAR versus MST. SHAHIDA RANI

Section Ben 42, the plaintiff in the evidence of the left transaction, claimed that he was the real owner of the suit property and that the defendant simply did not claim or claim that the plaintiff Validetti plaintiff had ever explicitly claimed or claimed the suit property in the name of the defendant. At the time of purchase, there was a clear agreement or between them that the suit property was his property and the defendant was merely a fraudster In the absence of proof of understanding of such agreement / evidence, the anonymous owner was not judicially acknowledged. May be purchased in the name of the claimant from its funds. The registered sale deed in favor of the defendant did not prove that the most important title document coming from the possession of the accused was the registered sale deed dated 14 1995 1995, which was in possession of the sale deed and the possession of the property for four years was at a reasonable price. Which was the sale process. Before the marriage between the parties and there was no reason for the plaintiff to hand over the document to the defendant, the transaction was anonymous The plaintiff failed to prove the matter because Benami was dismissed in favor of the plaintiff suit. jobs for fresh advocates from Kallur Kot lawyer