Find a Lawyer

YOUNUS KHASKHELI versus STATE

Definition of Section 13D Evidence Complaints The police officer failed to produce documentary evidence at the relevant time leaving the police station, which made the prosecution's case doubtful, contradicting the material contention in the prosecution's evidence. The accused had suggested a false and serious crime. The trial and the fact that he was innocent had acquitted the accused in the drug case on almost the same evidence presented by these special witnesses, which was denied and an appeal was filed against the accused's fate in this case. Was not made, the prosecution failed to prove that the accused in the present case was acquitted.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• GULISTAN KHAN (MEHMAND) v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Islamabad 2009 MLD 322
• CHUTTAL KHAN CHACHAR v. Mst. SHAHIDA RANI 2009 CLC 324
• NIZAR ALI FAZWANI v. PAK GOLF LEASING COMPANY LIMITED 2009 PCrLJ 325
• Mst. AZRA BHATTI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION HYDRI 2009 PLD 325
• Mst. SHABNAM v. FEDERATON OF PAKISTAN through General Manager/Operations Pakistan Railways Headquarters Office, Laho 2009 PLC(CS) 327
• QURBAN ALI ABBASI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2009 PLD 327
• Dr. SHAKEEL AHMED SIDDIQUI v. PAK LIBYA HOLDING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD 2009 CLD 329
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. GAMMON OF PAKISTAN LTD. 2009 CLD 330

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

power of attorney advocate Narang Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes