Find a Lawyer

DIL ARA BEGUM versus SHAUKAT ALI BEG

The scope suit filed by the respondent for recovery of Rs. 25,000 in cash and 200 kanals for registration of section 178 of the Registration Act, 1901, states that the judgment was given to Kabinama by the Appellate Court. The court had challenged the orders that since Kubinama intended to transfer agricultural land, the value of compulsory registration worth more than Rs 100 was unnecessary where no right was made in favor of the applicant in respect of the land acquired. , The Cabernetists merely recount Dwyer's facts and do not create, extinguish, declare or assign it to themselves. Were. The title of any immovable property or any immovable property therein was not the immediate intent of this document, nor the final result of it, which determined whether a document required a compulsory registration. Fixing created the obligation for the husband to pay the amount or property mentioned in it. Proof of this was not to transfer any immovable property on its own, Dover's Factum has been designated as the default applicant as it will be entitled to recover the default Dowager list of supreme court advocates from Talhur lawyer