EHSAN ALI versus STATE
Definition of Section 302 Evidence In the case of the prosecution, it looks somewhat dubious as no direct evidence regarding the commission of the crime of the witnesses of the first three prosecutors was available in the record, who asked the accused in the bag near the mosque wall. And the police officers were different from person to person, with respect to the arrest and arrest of the police officers, the prosecution's witness was silent about the place where the accused was arrested by the police officer. Because the prosecution's witness had resigned to make a different story. Was inappropriate and unreasonable by the prosecution, as it had no direct evidence. Most witnesses' statements were based on information received from each other, and even without such convincing evidence, it was not safe to believe the evidence that was not affected by the complaint filed in the FIR. The motive of any conviction was that the accused had killed the victim due to enmity and enmity; no hostility or hostility was specified by the complainant till the investigating officer, who was investigating the matter. During the period, nothing was brought under the head of the accused. Despite the motive behind the assassination of the accused, some fragments of the human body were not found despite being examined by the Medical Officer as well as the Chemical Examiner, as submitted by the post-mortem report. The doctor said that the head, face, neck and neck were completely swollen and the medical officer did not know what the above fragments were.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Naukot lawyer