Find a Lawyer

SHADAB DEVELOPERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER AND ANOTHER versus ABDULLAH

Sections 12, 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XII, R6 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 29 of the Sindh Civil State Land (Allotment, Conversion and Conversion Cancellation) Ordinance (III of 2001), Sec. 3 5 and for the performance of the contract, declaration, order and direction, the sale agreements between the plaintiffs and the defendants were implemented in which it was expressly stated that the real estate was frozen by the Provincial Board of Revenue. And the seller was in charge. Pay the property discrimination for the issuance of the said property from the Board of Revenue Said contracts also say that the required amount will be paid directly to the Board of Revenue for the release of the exempted land after the issuance of the challan. The Board of Revenue Parties, under the circumstances, had entered into a contingent agreement with the confession and the land under consideration was not completely free from any land, and was frozen, to be released after the completion of certain conditions, In such a situation, the sales agreements may be revoked and not be able to enforce / enforce the provisions of O XII, R 4 of, in the present case the CPC was not attracted, As the parties concerned entered into an agreement which was a permanent agreement, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, The ground was already canceled, in the circumstances, no unrelated and unconditional admission order was made under O. Twelfth, R, the CPC can certainly be approved, provided that the defendant's admission is specific, clear. Be clear, unambiguous and precise property advocate from Harnai lawyer