Find a Lawyer

AHMAD HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH

Applicants belonging to the High Right Rule of the Sun Prefecture Act, 1913, Section 15 of the Punjab Prevention Act, were purchased from the land by the applicant along with the alien. The basis for the sinking principle, and thus they could not claim equal rights to Adan before becoming an owner in the State and that the applicant / sale was also a pre-trial matter, withholding, no matter Didn't have. If the aforesaid sale can be vacated by any person on the basis of property ownership in which the applicant may be deemed alien to have joined with the non-owner, such case 31 198 The decision was not reached before 1986 (as per the law, the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Syed Kanal Shah reported as PLD 1986 SC 360) was liable to be dismissed. In the case of the defendants' decision making, clear and illegally unwanted decisions and orders were set aside and the case filed by the defendant against the applicants was dismissed in the circumstances. immigration advocates email from Kamalia Musa lawyer