Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus IMAM DIN

The District Judge, rejecting the civil procedure code order of the plaintiffs' cases of CPC Plants Section 12 (A) and O. VIII, R11, dismissed the trial case by calling the remand questionnaire. The case was dismissed. The judgment and decision passed by the trial court was illegal, void and ineffective against their rights, and the plaintiff had to permanently ban the injunction under which the decree was challenged and grounded. Was misidentified. The trial court found that the defendants had misrepresented that because the plaintiffs in the plaintiff had challenged the validity of the order passed by the civil court, the case was barred under section 12 (2). That is, the CPC district judge did not provide any clear information on this important aspect of the case. Issue a stay order in front of him and get his remand on the matter that as the matter has been settled, the plaintiff should not have been rejected. In the context of R V 11, R 11, the trial court under the CPC, neither the structure of the case nor the fact that the defendants have already directed the evidence, O VII, R 11 No matter, the CPC district judge should have focused his attention. Regarding the all-important question whether section 12 (2), the issue was banned by the CPC, and in this regard it was made clear that the order of remand was set aside. And the defendants' appeal has been referred to the District Judge for disposal in accordance with the law. family advocate from Hayatabad lawyer