SHAMIM AKHTAR versus GUARDIAN JUDGE
Guardian's and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XVII, R 3 Detention of a minor application filed by defendant, petitioner's mother upon obtaining custody of the minor's father, juvenile Guardian Judge, at the hearing. She was allegedly unable to attend court due to a serious illness that was earlier scheduled to be adjourned for the hearing that day. Respondents' father admitted that she had given her child Didn't pay for the care and didn't know. As far as his son was studying and he never tried to see his son after divorcing his wife, the minor's mother was happily living with her grandmother. The facts revealed that the defendant. The father was not interested in the welfare of the minor, married the second, and if he had survived, the minor would not be physically and mentally safe in the presence of his stepmother if his custody of her. The father was given the opportunity to present his evidence in denial of the evidence presented by the defendant, petitioner The proof of the case should not have been closed in the case of guardianship where the minor was interested, stopping the proof of the minor's mother without legal proof in the court order provided the parties with full opportunity to present evidence according to the law. After the trial, the judge was asked to re-apply for custody
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kacha Khooh lawyer