MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN versus STATE
Sections 497 and 561 apply for grant of a Control of Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), Section 6/9 (c) Bail in exchange for application under Section 555A, the CCPC prosecution case was that of confidential information. The anti-narcotic force was later arrested by the main suspect, who is said to have stood with the accused and other accomplices in the airport's departure lounge, with the main suspect or co-accused against the accused and civil. As an employee of the Aviation Authority, he stood by it. He was not questioned about customs clearance from the customs as the main accused was leaving the country and the suitcase had to be deposited only at the relevant airline counter. No customs clearance is required, in the circumstances, from trial to trial, to the trial, the trial court failed to cite any witnesses, to prove that the prosecution did not require any witness to know I failed that the suspect was aware that his suitcase contained the main suspect. Or the defendant attempted to facilitate him in any way; under the circumstances, the request for bail under section 6161A, CRPC, was changed to a plea, as the action against the accused in the case would be pointless. Because of this, the accused is unlikely to be sentenced. The contents of the pending prosecution proceedings against the trial accused were dropped, and the accused ordered to be released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jamshoro lawyer