MST. SHABINA MANSOOR versus MERRY LAND BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Sections 12, 39 and 54 of the Civil Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10 & O VII, R 11 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 High Court Appeal Suit Revocation, Special Performance, Permanent Prohibition and Damages Dismissing The plaintiff's litigation party was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff did not approach the relevant authority against which the plaintiff had filed a petition under the OI, R10, CPC on the matter that He is one of the buyers of this case. The property and the civil lawsuit were filed, but the case was dismissed in the same order as the defendant's lawyer had earlier said in the lawsuit filed by the defendant that he filed an appeal against the dismissal order. But without hearing it, the following appeals court dismissed it. A similar order was passed by the High Court counsel for the intervener, however, he said that he would be satisfied and would not pressurize his request. If the appellate court is given a simple injunction to dismiss the appeal according to its merits, and after a proper hearing, the High Court has directed that the appellate court accordingly deal with the intervener's appeal to the court strictly in accordance with the law. Go
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Badin lawyer