Find a Lawyer

MOKHA versus SARWARI BCGUM

Section 12 of the Property Act 1882 (IX of 1872), section 55 (2) of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), the suit for the specific purpose of the section 52 agreement was excluded by the trial court. That the appellant had failed to perform its part of the contract and that the contract was at the time of signing the deadline of the sale contract was not enough by its own strength to conclude the contract. So that the appellants should have been aware of their obligation to pay the sale price and the respondent was completely silent on the appropriate contract for the seller for which it was sold. The sub-registrar did not appear before the sub-registrar to receive the money, but the appellants were sent without notice to the appellant, under which the appellants apprehended that the lawyer trying to represent the lawyer had There is no real certificate in the light of his former behavior. n The entire record of the appointment and cancellation of such powers shadowed the decree of the female lady suit under the circumstances. online advocate from Matli lawyer