Find a Lawyer

LAL HUSSAIN versus SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporarily Pairing and Interlocutory Orders A. XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 of the Canal and Sewage Act (VIII of 1873), Section 11 Applicant / Plaintiff by distributing irrigation through irrigation water to land, The area was purchased by the Divisional Canal Officer ordered to join the canal area and irrigation was allowed for irrigation. On appeal from the petitioner it was stated that the B5 Superintendent Canal Officer had challenged the two orders of the canal authorities while filing an interlocutory declaration claim. On the basis that the applicants did not work with any notice by the Divisional Canal Officer, before applying for an unlawful order, the applicant filed a temporary injunction as well as a petition for the trial. The trial court / appeals court petitioner challenged that with the dismissal of the High Court order, the parties' consent was ordered that the defendants be bound to maintain the quantity of water before the applicants welcomed them. What was, even if time changed tax advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer