Find a Lawyer

MASTER HAMMAD versus SALIM MIRZA

The evidence contained by the trial parties for the Section 1 fatal accident compensation proved that the accident occurred in the same manner as the plaintiff alleged. And it has also been proved that the driver of the coach was quick and negligent in operating such a coach when the accident occurred in which the plaintiff was seriously injured, in this case for demonstration of consciousness, care, caution and duty recognition. No evidence was available. Driver's: The plaintiff suffered traumatic injuries. There is ample evidence on record that it was reported that the injured driver was beaten and negligently served as the plaintiff's employee and in the plaintiff's case. The case was underway. They were covered by the driver and the plaintiff's reputable liability, in which case the driver was entitled to compensation for his or her misconduct, driving the vehicle recklessly and recklessly, resulting in a major accident. As a result, they were injured. The suit filed by the plaintiff against the plaintiff was jointly ordered against the plaintiff. Various costs in the amount of Rs. immigration advocate from Patoki lawyer