RAMZAN ALI HEMANI versus HABIB BANK LTD.
Sections 9 and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution for Accountability Appeal, suspension of suspension and payment of wages, cancellation of salaries, etc. The respondents / bank filed an FIR against the applicant in which it was alleged that the applicant as manager had misused millions of rupees. The Bank's Funds applicant was suspended and a reference was filed in the Accountability Court against the applicant, which was pending adjournment. The bank subsequently declined. On the basis of the service policy, the applicant was claiming salary for the suspension period and his suspension order was also denied which validity existed for refusing the applicant's salary during this suspension. Was not, despite the fact that he was an applicant. Accusing the defendant of a crime against him due to jail registration and the allegations of FIR registration will not convict anyone of the crime for which he was charged. He was gone until he was found guilty. Reference was still pending against the applicant in the present case by a competent court law, in which case, his suspension from the date of his entitlement to the transfer of shares of the employer's bank in favor of another institution. Was exempt from the history of Complaint regarding dismissal of his / her job from the job when the respondent / bank's controlling shares and administration were first.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer