Find a Lawyer

NAZEER AHMED versus STATE

Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Definition of Section 103 Evidence Benefits of Suspicion At the time of the recovery of the suspect as a police witness investigative officer, the investigating officer has taken the private person as a witness to the recovery. Didn't share and just depended. In addition, he filed a complaint on his subordinates and, in this case, investigated the matter under the control section 25 of the Police Office of Police or any other power investigating officer, the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, to exclude independent witnesses. Was not competent, nor did he abolish the principle of presentation. In keeping with the provisions of the CCPC, the best available clause 1033, which was vigilant in search of all other things, the legislature called upon the honorable persons to seek and seek to attend. Deemed it appropriate to do The provisions of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 of the Drug Control Act, 1997, were linked to the common law of the land and resulted in an adventure so that police and other forces could be freely handled while dealing with drug cases. Except for the application of section 103, CR PC, in matters, the legislature did not grant any additional honors. Or an officer holding additional cleansing on police or officers of such force, excluded free persons from acting as witness to arrest and recovery, and selected two subordinates to act as witnesses. , Who did not support the prosecution's case, the confiscation officer acted as a self-investigating officer, and the trial court declared him innocent as one of the two men sent to trial. female advocates from Thatta lawyer