MUHAMMAD NAFECS versus TARIQ MEHMOOD
Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 on the basis of Land Land on which a shopkeeper claiming to own property in the village had opposed the pre-emption suit filed by the Pre-Importer in respect of agricultural land, It was obtained by the shopkeeper for gift purposes only 7 days before the filing of the pre-emption suit, although the building was gifted to the shopkeeper for the intended purpose, but it was of agricultural nature and was assessed on land revenue. And although the seller collected the building on the spot, it was not built , The court itself has shown the wrong way. To say that the seller's land had been acquired for agricultural purposes and the shopkeeper had moved out of the property because the purpose for which the gift was given was to construct a house and also the construction equipment for Wendy's land. Mainly collected as being agricultural. Nature, could not be considered merely to dwell on ideas that would otherwise not have been appropriate in the context of the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer