MST. RUBINA versus STATE
Sections 6 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 561A, and 439 applicants / victims were alleged to have been abducted, held in illegal prison, and gang-rape accused named in the FIR. Dari was charged with a medical superintendent for his medical checkup and was regularly examined by a gynecologist, and the medical report proved that the applicant had been gang-raped. The / applicant / victim girl's lawyer alleged that the accused, who was very influential, had investigated. Xi had received a report from the officer. In order to excuse themselves, the Investigation Officer submitted a report to the magistrate to deal with the B Class Investigation Officer under Section 173, CR PC, along with the accused, assisting the poor young student orphan girl. Instead of trying to convict the accused as an innocent investigating officer, because the motives have ruined the case of litigation and, on the contrary, involved the orphaned young girl, the Advocate General has filed a magistrate petition for registration of the case. He also opposed the subsequent order that the investigating officer knowingly and willfully misled Has been investigated and has failed to perform his legal duties, the criminal revision request was changed and allowed in the application under section 6161 AA, CR PC. Following the investigation of the case, an officer not below the level of D-Section P probe was immediately called to the relevant RPO for investigation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer