MUHAMMAD AYOOB versus STATE
Section 9 (c) conviction of the evidence, only 8 packets containing 8 kg of marijuana was sent for chemical testing while no other sample of the remaining 32 packets weighing 32 kg was taken. Was against the accused consisting of four. Do not fall under section 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic Material Act 1997, the State Council did not endorse the legal request made by the accused's lawyer and confirmed that 8 packet cell containing 8 kilograms of hashish Were made and sent for chemical inspection while no sample. Out of the 32 packets containing 32 kilograms, four were taken out, while maintaining the conviction of the accused, the general sentence given to him was reduced to 10 years from the life imprisonment, and the fine was also increased to Rs 300,000. It was reduced to Rs 50,000. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Sanjwal lawyer