Find a Lawyer

SHAWAZ KHAN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Evidence Definition The benefit of the suspect was found by the driver of the pickup which the four had recovered, the accused could only be held in the stomach for responsibility for the crime when he had possession of the vehicle and Control was established. The prosecution failed to establish and control the accused on the vehicle, as the accused was not sitting in the vehicle, simply standing near the vehicle and not controlling the vehicle as the car was recovered. In connection with the Madison Supply Company, the Investigation Officer was obliged to either include the responsible officers of the company as co-accused in the crime, or at least he should have referred them as witnesses so to speak. It could be ascertained whether the accused was driving his vehicle as his vehicle. This type of error by the prosecution does not look good to the investigating officer, no doubt, the chemical inspector's report was positive and the substance sent to him was found to be charismatic, but the Chemical Examiner's report, In the absence of convincing ocular evidence, Chars was not able to prove guilt for the recovery of the convicted vehicle, unless the defendant's guilt against the accused by evidence The occupation, which was lacking fours, was allegedly packed in cartons and the cartons were not produced. The excise police in the court filled the bags with all four of the custom recovered, because the excise police did not save and present the cartoon to the court, a question for which the prosecutor could not offer a condemnatory explanation. top advocate from Sherani lawyer