Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RASOOL versus STATE

Section 497 Narcotic Material; The Control Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) bail, bail bail, was sought by the accused on three grounds. That despite being well aware of the police, failed to associate with a private adviser. Of the total two kilograms of the chars, only 110 grams were sent for chemical analysis and could only be attributed to 110 grams, not the entire property, as the offense against him was charged in section 9 (b). Will be covered under Control of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997, which did not draw the bar in section 551 of the said Act, and in this case Section HO was the complainant and acted as a self-investigating officer, Had expressed serious doubt about the reality of the investigation. Their validity, section 103, did not apply to CRPC cases under the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 under section 25 of the said Act. There is no problem in sending a sample of 110 grams, as the trial court may send the remaining property for chemical examination at the request of the accused. And that it was not illegal for the complainant to act as an investigating officer in these matters, a report of inquiry by an honest officer indicated that there was some misconduct by the complainant inspector. The game has been recovered, otherwise given the general attitude and behavior. Local police, an officer of the police department and also posted in the same jurisdiction were not expected to report a negative report against his colleague, further investigating the case together with the circumstances in the FIR. Who made this case suspicious best law firm from Shahdad Kot lawyer