GUL BADSHAH versus MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN
Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Pre-emption of Agricultural Land in Housing Colony in Land Holding P jar Pedawar and Acceptance of Evidence and Evidence, Determination of Land Properties The significance of the evidence has to be examined by examining the facts in each case. The report of the local commissioner who visited the occasion indicated that the land was surrounded by roads. Houses built by area residents and civil servants. Electricity was provided to the area, power lines were fixed in the streets. Metal roads were provided and the land itself was a part of the acquisition and an integral part of the housing colony. Such land was released to the owner for the purpose of building a mosque, dra madrasa and anchorage. ? Evidence supporting the agricultural nature of the land in particular, Har Jhar Pedwar Kha and Khusra Garwadi were neither prepared for public duty nor were presented under the evidence that the first appellate court was to find that The ground was not empty, based on the material on record. The second appeal was not open for examination as such land was absorbed in the housing colony, it did not retain its rural character, but the citizen acquired immovable property status and was thus subject to pre-arrest. was not.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer