ABDUL SATTAR ALIAS PAPOO versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Bail, denying the role assigned to the accused was similar to that of a co-accused whose request for bail was already dismissed by the trial court. Had done Also, the counsel appearing for the accused related to the merit by the High Court was unable to distinguish between the accused and the partner against the accused, in the circumstances not covered by section 497 (2). Were. , CR PC bail application was rejected in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Gujrat lawyer
