Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED SOLANGI versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 161, 420, 468, 471 and 477 A / 34 of the Prevention of Corruption (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) bail, further investigation of the complainant. The case was a grant. The Revenue Department officials, in association with the accused, committed fraud in the Revenue Record in connection with the underground land, and the fake record in the Revenue Record through fake sources was further alleged that the fake entry was obtained by the accused earlier. At the time of the acquittal, the accused obtained the Cell Certificate and then on the power of such cell certificate, the co-accused got a General Power of Attorney registered in favor of the accused in charge of his son, even though the cell in favor of the co-accused. The certificate was issued, but it was issued on the basis of registration He was already on the revenue record from 1981, the accused, under the circumstances, did not play any role in recording the fraudulent entry even if it was said that the fake entry was filed during the period of employment of the accused. Prior to the post, the Revenue Record needed to investigate the case against the accused so that further investigation could be made, he was entitled to be released on bail, the accused was granted bail. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mandra lawyer