Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392/413/34 Bail, the trial court's grant which denied the accused's bail, indicated that after recording the evidence of the complainant, the accused The High Court has the power to refer the case to the trial court so that the accused can be allowed to re-enter the bail application in the lower court. However, since five months had passed and the complainant had not recorded his statement, it would unnecessarily delay the accused's request for bail. Having decided on its own facts and circumstances, not in relation to other cases, especially those that were not proven, the state had to prove its case against the accused and to approve the relevant bail so fast. The accused fled. , Interfere with prosecution witnesses, or commit other offenses In the present case it seems that there is a limited likelihood of such events, the surety rule should be a rat. It would not be an exception, except that an accused would not have to remain in jail for long, while the prosecution dragged his feet in the trial, while in the cases the accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
