MANZOOR AHMED versus LIAQAT ALI
Sections 395, 397, 504, 337f (i) (vi), 147, 148 and 149 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Appeal against the eviction of section 417 when the matter was settled for evidence of the complainant and his witnesses. On the other hand, his witness and his lawyer disappeared without notice; in the circumstances, the complainant / appellant stopped and after recording the defendant's statement under section 342, the CRPC charged him Exempted from The appellant was not intentionally or willfully absent, but he was sent to Karachi on the relevant date for filing a petition before the High Court and was told that the material available on record was not supported and the respondents The case against him was repeatedly postponed. For one reason or another and the appellant did not direct his evidence, nor did he present any evidence before the trial court to the appellant as he had his counsel absent from the court without notice. The trial court apparently stopped the appellant and the proceedings passed by the court below did not find any weakness or illegal motion to proceed with the matter so as to seek intervention by the High Court. Can be \ r \ n. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kamokey lawyer