QUTBUDDIN versus STATE
Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Bail, The prosecution's grant did not specify whether the sample was taken from each piece of the packet. And it did not even say what the weight of each piece was recovered from the accused's possession. And what was the right amount was taken from each piece. According to the indictment, the accused was selling narcotic drugs at Dargah, but despite waiting time for independent witnesses, the police were unable to find any counselor in the case. The accused's involvement in the crime cannot be ruled out in these circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kakur Town lawyer
