Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ versus STATE

Validating the evidence of section 302 (b), the death of the victim was unnatural and the incident was non-observable and no direct evidence was available as none of the prosecution's witnesses testified that they had None of them had seen the accused and his accomplices as they committed the murder. The last time no evidence was available on record and the prosecutor failed to prove the motive, because not a single word about the motive came from the testimony of the prosecution's witnesses, prosecutors said There was no blood stain on the accused's shirt. The knife was allegedly recovered from the complainant's factory in the presence of the complainant and a head constable four days after the arrest of the accused. And no one from the factory or around was involved in the recovery process, the prosecutor failed to bring the chemical analyst report on the record, which could indicate that human blood was found on the stolen complainant. Because he was the brother of the victim and he himself worked as a consultant on the location of the incident, body inspection, preparation of accused's shirt, arrest of accused and recovery of knife, which required independent cooperation. , In which the prosecution failed to establish a case against the accused outside the shadows. The suspects were convicted and sentenced under the trial of the suspected trial, the accused was acquitted of the charge and directed to be released. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kahror Pacca lawyer