Find a Lawyer

HAJI UMER versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, KARACHI

Section 3, 12 (5) and Article 152 Rules of Sindh Chief Court, R-331 First Appeal Approved on 27 11 2006 Decision was made on 30 2006 11 2006 Application for obtaining certified copies of decision / decree 5 12 was made on 2006. Created on 13 12 2006 and provided on 19 12 2006. Appeal filed on 11 1 2007. The petitioner's request for a restriction on his request was that the copy branch did not inform him of the preparation of the copy on 13 12 2006, thus, the time was up. Copies must be treated as obtaining copies between 13 12 2006 to 19 12 2006; Section 12 (5) of the Limitation Act 1908 and R331 of the Sindh Chief Court Rules provided that the applicant has notice of this date. Was entitled to have copies. In the absence of such notice, the appellant cannot be under any obligation to specify the delay between the date of manufacture and the date of delivery of copies. Used between the date of the day and the date of the date Many copies will be considered as the time required to obtain the copies The High Court set aside the inappropriate order while treating the appeal filed within time. went. tax advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer