Section 616161 An Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/109 Corruption Prevention Act (III 1947), Section 5 (2) Prohibition of Prohibition occurred in the year 1996, with one accused being convicted of the case. Was killed during detention. Another accused was acquitted by the High Court in the quashing proceedings; the current accused act did not cause any damage to the steel mills, which had been dragged into action for the last 12 years, to withdraw the case under the NRO. Was also recommended. No doubt, the proceedings under Section 1 561A, CRPC, provided neither additional nor alternative remedies, and the High Court could not have served the trial court, but in appropriate cases. To avoid abuse of court, high court proceedings. In exercising its power under Section 1 561A, the CCP may terminate proceedings, continuing the proceedings of the matter in the trial court, will be foolishly practiced, as it was unlikely to prove a crime. Continuing a criminal case against a defendant who has been prosecuted for any crime would be a misuse of the court process, and his recovery case would end the prosecution of the accused.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
