ABDUS SAMAD KHAN versus AI-AIDA
Admiralty Jurisdiction of the High Courts Ordinance 1980 Section 3 (2) (n) Claims for Balance of Wages for services rendered on the vessel Proof of employment certificate by the master of the vessel is always available for employment, wages and wages and To be accepted as proof of outstanding master. Issuing such a vessel certificate during employment was considered not only an owner's agent but also an agent's requirement and was such an authoritative and competent person who failed to issue defendants with such certificate. Was in loggerheads and other documents that were always on the ship and were in the owner's possession, to deny the claimant's claim, in the absence of any relevant and important record that was in the owner's custody. And in the absence of any reasonable explanation for its non-availability, the first punishment would be if If it would be against the interest of the owner of the vessel, an order for a certain amount of fendants was approved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Jacobabad lawyer