PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE versus MUHAMMAD ALI
Section 1 case for recovering damages in which the plaintiff injured by a bus collision in which he was traveling with another bus in which the defendant / appellant's employee was traveling was not another bus. Neither the owner nor his driver was employed by the appellant appellant even if he was responsible for the misconduct with the driver No evidence of the bus was presented which shows that the driver of the bus was the employee of the appellant so The drivers should be held responsible for the haste and negligence of the fact that the bus was used as a private carrier for the appellant. Yet he does not blame her. Under the terms of the rental agreement between the appellant and the driver of the bus, the employer of the master and the servant or the principal and the agent driver could not be the servant of the bus for which he was only working. A bus carrier, thus, on behalf of a third person, the plaintiff, condemns the negligence of the servant and not the pelellate interpretation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
