Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD SHAH versus CHAIRMAN, KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The provisions of Section 31A of the Customs Act, 1969, as added under the Finance Ordinance (II BF 1988), are under the influence of effective applicants, even if applicable in accordance with applicable rates. Pay customs duty on the goods. They are entitled to approve bills of entry dates, or even their associated goods on payment of customs duty, at which prices they enter into firm agreements with foreign suppliers for their import. Were present on the date. In the case of Elmrose 1986 SCMR 1917 Section 31A, the law enacted by the Supreme Court, incorporated by means of the Finance Ordinance 1988, has been incorporated and considered so far from the date of the implementation of the Customs Act 1969. Exceptionally, a party has been referred in favor of payment of customs duty under the notification of exemption at the discounted rates which he entered when he entered C. In connection with the import of such goods through the Legislature, the Finance Ordinance of 1988 demanded by the customs authorities that it was strictly complied with the law, meaning that Section 5 (2) of the Finance Ordinance 1988 Effect. Section 31A of the Fiction Act, Customs Act, 1969 was included in the Customs Act, 1969, the Customs Act, 1969, after section 31, thus, there is no power in this matter. Section A ret A is not practically enforceable added 31 An important consequence of the provision provided by A is that the amount of customs duty paid on imported goods as a result of a full exemption or discount or discount. May be payable. Whether on duty or in contracts of sale of such goods us immigration advocates from Gambet lawyer