QAMARUDDIN versus ABU BAKAR KHAN
Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 SS15 & 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), exclude further evidence of the XLI, R27, on the facts and legal points of the High Court proceedings in the first period of litigation. The rental controller was remanded to hear arguments. The rent controller allowed the landlord to examine two witnesses without filing an application on his own and dismissed the tenant's request for additional evidence regarding the property's PTI, which led to the dismissal. The order was again sought by the High Court and the tenant's request was allowed through the rent voluntarily the controller but the order was also re-summoned by the rent controller that the tenant did not have the opportunity to control the rent. He can examine the officer concerned to prove his truth, said HC. The landlord, in the case of the document, directed the tenant to ask the relevant persons in the application case, which he prayed that - he may be allowed to call the Assistant Director (Land) office in Ritchie Municipal. The corporation will prove the ownership of the shop in question
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Samma Satta lawyer