Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD KHAN versus ABDUL AZIZ KHAN

Evidence Act 1872 Section 155 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Review Admission Investigation The court upheld the trial court's decision of the appellate court, upholding the order for the appellate court's removal. The order for Mason's profit challenged the challan that the defendant admitted in cross-examination that the applicant was his tenant and that five cases were dismissed, the trial court was not able to record the inquiry on the previous cases. In the litigation it was decided that there was no tenant between the landlord's relationship and the parties, therefore, there was no benefit of the respondents' entry to the applicant and the respondent did not give up any particular case. The trial was justified, neither evidence is misrepresented nor There was no mistranslation evidence on the record. There was no case for interference. immigration advocates phone number from Ghotki lawyer