Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE


Articles 156 (8), 180 and 215 of Pakistan Customs Act 1969 (1973), Article 199 Judicial process legalizing the recovery of prohibited articles The applicant was not mentioned as a Special Judge (Customs) applicant. In the FIR filed against the central accused applicant, neither the showcase notice was given nor the authorities had any material available to support the allegations against it, nor any legal action against the applicant. Was not proven. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the judicial decision that was passed against the applicant in violation of the provisions of the Customs Act, 1969, was completely against the applicability of the principles of illegal and natural justice. Without legal authority and no legal effect was declared by the High Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.