DILSHAD versus ABUL KALAM
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 Disclosure Personal Requirements Landedi needs premises for personal use The tenant in his written statement did not include any evidence to support the case setup with his son. His mother lived in the house. Landadi's brothers and sisters had rented the house in 1973 and had not increased the rent, her husband divorced Landlady, and the tenant alleged that PAGRI had given the house to Maldie. The written statement did not reveal that Landlady wanted to live independently in her home. And his demand was defeated in front of the courts because his mother owned a large house that was not suitable, a thorough examination, a record of all the surrounding conditions and consideration. The result of the excitement concludes that the landlord has presented a case of successful eviction. An order to evict the tenant based on personal necessity was approved by the rent controller and orders to evict the tenants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer