SAKINA versus EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, A\' DIVISION, KARACHI
Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 Trial exclusion and negligence of the legal role of the case for the mandatory injunction and the absence of the right to the property affect the respondent's second respondent. Order found on plot lease. The decree reversed by the challenged challenger in the civil suit failed to disclose any legal role or was true in his property The negative possession of the applicants was also not valid, no one with the plaintiff applicants There was no legal role under which they could be called property owners. There was no liability in favor of the applicants in the dispute and no relief was provided for litigation in the trial court, thus it cannot be said that in dismissing the plaintiff, There is an illegal operation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer
